top of page

King Lear and the Consequences of Misjudgment

2 days ago
26 min read

A guide for students and teachers



Why King Lear is literature's greatest study of misjudgment


King Lear is the greatest example in literature of the consequences of misjudgment. Almost every catastrophe in the play grows from a single failure: a father who cannot tell the people who love him from the people who flatter him. Lear misjudges his daughters. Gloucester misjudges his sons. Both men drive away the children who are loyal to them and reward the children who will destroy them.


That makes the play more than a historical artifact. Every day, you judge the people around you. Whether you judge them well or badly shapes your friendships, your romantic relationships, your business partnerships, your work, and your family. Reading King Lear closely is one of the best ways to sharpen that skill.


By "judgment" I don't mean only the final verdict, like a judge banging a gavel: this person is bad, case closed. I mean the continual work of assessing the people around you, and yourself. Who is this person? What matters to them? Why are they acting this way? Are they honest? Do they keep their promises? How do they treat people when they don't get what they want?


Those are moral judgments, and they require thought. You have to look at what a person actually says and does, understand what it tells you about their character, and be willing to reconsider when you learn more. Judgment also means recognizing the good: seeing someone's honesty, courage, and loyalty, and understanding why they deserve your trust. That is where Lear fails most completely.


A note on the text: quotations follow the conflated text used in most modern editions. Act and scene numbers are given; line numbers vary between editions.


Louis C.K. and the comic inversion of tragedy


A comedian offers a useful way into the play, precisely because he gets it backwards. After Louis C.K.'s disgusting behavior toward female comics became public in 2017, he returned to the stage with a bit about trouble. People say that when you're in trouble, you find out who your real friends are. He points out that they say it as if it's a good thing. He would rather not know. He liked having a crowd of fake friends and no idea which was which. Then the real friends show up, and his reaction is roughly: that's my real friend? That's not the one I would have picked.


The joke works by inversion. In tragedy, the hero needs to know who his friends are, and the knowledge comes too late to stop the destruction. In comedy, the character doesn't want to know at all, and his refusal is funny. Louis C.K. wishes the people who stood by him were different people: the cool, attractive, impressive ones rather than the awkward one who actually showed up.


Many of us feel some version of this. We would like the glamorous person to be our loyal friend, not the plain one. The joke lands because discovering the truth about the people around you can be painful. You usually learn it while you're already suffering, and it hurts most if you've built your life around getting it wrong.


King Lear is the tragic version of the same discovery. Lear finds out who his real friends are, and it costs him everything.


The plot of King Lear, act by act (full spoilers)


Knowing the ending won't spoil this play. It should be read, watched, and returned to throughout your life, not finished once and forgotten.


Act 1. Lear, the aging king of Britain, wants to hand off the burdens of ruling while keeping the title and treatment of a king. He will divide the kingdom among his three daughters, but first he asks each to declare how much she loves him. Goneril and Regan answer with extravagant flattery. Cordelia, the youngest, refuses to compete. Lear disowns her, banishes Kent for defending her, and splits the kingdom between the older two. The King of France marries Cordelia without a dowry. Meanwhile the Earl of Gloucester's illegitimate son, Edmund, forges a letter convincing his father that his legitimate son, Edgar, is plotting murder. Lear goes to live with Goneril, who immediately begins cutting back his household. Kent returns in disguise as a servant named Caius and enters Lear's service.


Act 2. Edgar flees and disguises himself as "Poor Tom," a mad beggar. Goneril and Regan join forces and whittle away Lear's hundred knights until he has none. Lear storms out into the night.


Act 3. On the heath, in a violent storm, Lear begins to go mad, accompanied by the Fool, Kent, and Edgar as Poor Tom. Gloucester secretly helps the king. Edmund betrays him, and Regan's husband Cornwall gouges out Gloucester's eyes. Regan then tells him it was Edmund who betrayed him.


Act 4. The blinded Gloucester, now knowing that Edgar was innocent, wanders toward Dover. Edgar, still disguised, leads his father and saves him from despair. Cordelia lands with a French army and finds her father. They reconcile. Goneril and Regan both pursue Edmund romantically.


Act 5. The British forces under Edmund defeat the French. Lear and Cordelia are captured, and Edmund secretly orders their deaths. Edgar defeats Edmund in single combat. Goneril poisons Regan, then kills herself. Gloucester dies when Edgar finally reveals himself. A dying Edmund tries to revoke the order, but too late. Lear enters carrying Cordelia's body, and he dies over it.


Hold that final image in your mind: a father carrying the dead daughter who loved him, whom he cast away. It is the image the whole play exists to produce.


The love test: a close reading of Act 1, Scene 1


The opening scene contains the play's central error in miniature, and it rewards slow reading. Lear has assembled the court around a map of the kingdom. Land, wealth, and power are about to be distributed, and he sets the terms:

Tell me, my daughters,— Since now we will divest us both of rule, Interest of territory, cares of state,— Which of you shall we say doth love us most? That we our largest bounty may extend Where nature doth with merit challenge.

Notice what Lear has done. He has turned love into a competition with a prize, and he has made the prize depend on speech. Imagine being one of the daughters, standing before the whole court, asked to perform your love for a reward.

Goneril sets the bar

Sir, I love you more than words can wield the matter; Dearer than eyesight, space, and liberty; Beyond what can be valued, rich or rare; No less than life, with grace, health, beauty, honour; As much as child e'er loved, or father found; A love that makes breath poor, and speech unable; Beyond all manner of so much I love you.

The speech is a string of superlatives with no content. She claims her love is beyond words while producing a great many of them. Every comparison is to something abstract (eyesight, liberty, life), and none of it describes anything she has done or will do for her father.

Regan raises the bid

I am made of that self metal as my sister, And prize me at her worth. In my true heart I find she names my very deed of love; Only she comes too short: that I profess Myself an enemy to all other joys, Which the most precious square of sense possesses; And find I am alone felicitate In your dear highness' love.

Regan's move is pure auction. Whatever Goneril said, Regan says it plus more: she is happy in nothing at all except her father's love. Both sisters are married, which makes the claim absurd on its face, and Lear does not notice.


Cordelia refuses to compete


While her sisters speak, Shakespeare lets us hear Cordelia's thoughts in two asides:

What shall Cordelia speak? Love, and be silent.
Then poor Cordelia! And yet not so; since, I am sure, my love's More ponderous than my tongue.

"Ponderous" here means weighty. Her love is heavier than anything she could say, and she will not cheapen it by putting it up for auction. Then Lear turns to her:

Lear: what can you say to draw A third more opulent than your sisters? Speak. Cordelia: Nothing, my lord. Lear: Nothing! Cordelia: Nothing. Lear: Nothing will come of nothing: speak again. Cordelia: Unhappy that I am, I cannot heave My heart into my mouth: I love your majesty According to my bond; nor more nor less.

Lear's question gives the game away: what can you say to draw a third more opulent. He is openly asking her to bid. Cordelia's "bond" is the natural tie between a daughter and her father, with its real obligations. When he presses her, she spells it out:

Good my lord, You have begot me, bred me, loved me: I Return those duties back as are right fit, Obey you, love you, and most honour you. Why have my sisters husbands, if they say They love you all? Haply, when I shall wed, That lord whose hand must take my plight shall carry Half my love with him, half my care and duty: Sure, I shall never marry like my sisters, To love my father all.

This is the most clear-sighted speech in the scene. Cordelia describes love as something reciprocal and grounded in reality: he raised her and loved her, and she returns obedience, love, and honor. She also exposes her sisters' lie with one question. If they love only their father, what are their husbands for?

Lear: But goes thy heart with this? Cordelia: Ay, good my lord. Lear: So young, and so untender? Cordelia: So young, my lord, and true.

What Lear is actually judging

Consider the evidence available to Lear. He has known these three women their whole lives. He has decades of their conduct to draw on. In this moment he acts as a judge handing down a final verdict, and he sets all that evidence aside in favor of two flattering speeches. Cordelia's refusal to flatter feels to him like a refusal to love. That is the misjudgment.

The daughters who gave him the feeling he wanted receive the kingdom. The one who told him the truth receives nothing. Lear has rewarded flattery and punished honesty, and the rest of the play shows the bill coming due.


Even Goneril and Regan see it. Alone together at the end of the scene, Goneril remarks on how poorly their father judged in casting off his favorite, and Regan replies:

'Tis the infirmity of his age: yet he hath ever but slenderly known himself.

The villains understand Lear better than he understands himself, and they are already planning how to use it.


Lear: a king who wants the feeling of love more than the fact of it


Lear's flaw is not stupidity. He is a powerful, experienced ruler. His flaw is that he has lived his whole life surrounded by people whose survival depended on pleasing him, and he has come to mistake the pleasure of praise for evidence of loyalty. Regan's line is the key: he "hath ever but slenderly known himself." A man who does not know himself cannot judge what he needs from others.


He wants to give up power and keep its privileges

Lear's plan contains a contradiction from the start. He announces that he will "shake all cares and business from our age" while keeping "the name, and all the additions to a king." He gives the power to command to others but expects everyone to go on treating him as though he still held it. That only works if the people receiving the power genuinely love him. He has just selected for flatterers, so he has guaranteed that it won't work.


The words are tested by actions


Once Goneril and Regan hold power, their declarations meet reality. Lear expects to live with them in turn, attended by a hundred knights. Goneril cuts his retinue in half. Lear's response shows the first crack in his self-image:

Does any here know me? This is not Lear: Does Lear walk thus? speak thus? Where are his eyes? ... Who is it that can tell me who I am?

The Fool answers: "Lear's shadow." Lear's identity rested on the deference of others, and as the deference disappears, so does his sense of who he is. He curses Goneril and reaches for one of the play's most famous lines:

How sharper than a serpent's tooth it is To have a thankless child!

He goes to Regan, expecting better. Instead the sisters bargain him down together, the love auction of Act 1 now run in reverse. Fifty knights become twenty-five, then ten, then five. Then Regan asks, "What need one?" Lear's reply is one of the great speeches in the play:

O, reason not the need: our basest beggars Are in the poorest thing superfluous: Allow not nature more than nature needs, Man's life's as cheap as beast's.

And in the same exchange comes the cruelest line of all. Lear protests, "I gave you all—" and Regan answers, "And in good time you gave it."


Recognition begins before the storm


Lear's awareness of his error starts earlier than many readers notice. In Act 1, Scene 5, talking with the Fool, he says almost under his breath, "I did her wrong." He is thinking of Cordelia. In the same scene he fears for his own sanity: "O, let me not be mad, not mad, sweet heaven!"

Recognizing a mistake doesn't let you reverse what followed from it. The kingdom is given away. Kent is banished. Cordelia is in France. Lear has to live through the consequences, and the next stage is the storm.


On the heath, Lear learns what he never saw as king

Thrown out into the storm, Lear rages at the heavens and casts himself as the victim:

I am a man More sinned against than sinning.

That is partly true. But the storm also humbles him into seeing beyond himself. For the first time he thinks about the people he ruled and ignored:

Poor naked wretches, wheresoe'er you are, That bide the pelting of this pitiless storm, How shall your houseless heads and unfed sides, Your loop'd and window'd raggedness, defend you From seasons such as these? O, I have ta'en Too little care of this!

A king who couldn't see his own daughter clearly is finally learning to see. It has cost him his kingdom and is about to cost him his mind.


The reconciliation and the end


When Lear wakes in Cordelia's care in Act 4, Scene 7, he is a different man. The king who demanded to be told how much he was loved now says:

Pray, do not mock me: I am a very foolish fond old man, Fourscore and upward, not an hour more nor less; And, to deal plainly, I fear I am not in my perfect mind.

He expects her to hate him, and he thinks she would be right to:

If you have poison for me, I will drink it. I know you do not love me; for your sisters Have, as I do remember, done me wrong: You have some cause, they have not.

Cordelia's answer is four words: "No cause, no cause." After they are captured in Act 5, Lear imagines a life with her in prison and is content with it:

Come, let's away to prison: We two alone will sing like birds i' the cage: When thou dost ask me blessing, I'll kneel down, And ask of thee forgiveness.

The king who made his daughters bid for his favor now imagines kneeling to one of them. He has finally judged rightly. Then Cordelia is hanged, and Lear enters carrying her body:

And my poor fool is hang'd! No, no, no life! Why should a dog, a horse, a rat, have life, And thou no breath at all? Thou'lt come no more, Never, never, never, never, never!

Ordinary creatures go on breathing, but the daughter he now desperately wants alive is dead. Lear dies moments later, possibly believing he sees her breathe.


Cordelia: love with a mind of its own


Cordelia is often read as simply good and simply wronged. She is more interesting than that. Her goodness consists in integrity: she refuses to let her words say more than her actions mean. In a court where speech has become currency, she won't counterfeit it.


Her refusal is a judgment, not stubbornness


Some readers fault Cordelia for being too proud or too blunt. Couldn't she have said something warm without joining the auction? But look at what she is responding to. Her father has publicly announced that the size of each daughter's inheritance depends on the size of her declaration. Any declaration she makes now is a bid. Her silence is the only answer that cannot be mistaken for a sale.


She also sees exactly what her sisters are. As she leaves with France, she tells them:

I know you what you are; And like a sister am most loath to call Your faults as they are named.

Cordelia judges correctly from the first scene. She is the character who sees clearly, which is why her father's failure to see her is so painful.


Others recognize her worth at once


The King of France, who has known Cordelia far less time than her father, sees what Lear cannot. Burgundy withdraws his suit once Cordelia has no dowry. France takes her anyway:

Fairest Cordelia, that art most rich being poor; Most choice, forsaken; and most loved, despised!

And he states the principle Lear has violated:

Love's not love When it is mingled with regards that stand Aloof from the entire point.

Love mixed with calculations about land and reward is not love. France judges her by her character; Burgundy by her price.


She returns without resentment


When Cordelia hears how her sisters have treated their father, she does not say I told you so. She raises an army and crosses the sea to rescue him. When he wakes and says she has cause to hate him, she answers, "No cause, no cause." Her love was never conditional on his good behavior toward her. It was grounded in what he had been to her as a father, and in her own judgment of what that bond required.


What Lear wanted instead of Cordelia's love


At the start, Cordelia's love seemed worth nothing to Lear because it would not give him the praise he wanted. He wanted the love of a dog: unquestioning devotion. Cordelia loved him as one human being loves another, with a mind and judgment of her own.


Shakespeare plants this idea early. The Fool, mocking Lear's preference for flattery, says:

Truth's a dog must to kennel; he must be whipped out, when Lady the brach may stand by the fire and stink.

A "brach" is a female hound. The honest dog gets whipped out to the kennel while the favored bitch lies by the fire. That is exactly what Lear has done with his daughters. At the end he asks why "a dog, a horse, a rat" should live while Cordelia lies dead. The animal comparison returns, and this time he knows the difference between a creature's devotion and a daughter's love.


Recognizing the ill in others is important and often hard. Recognizing the good in those who truly love you is frequently harder, and it matters more. Cordelia is the play's lesson in that second kind of judgment.


Goneril and Regan: flattery as a strategy for power


Goneril and Regan are not cartoon villains. They are shrewd, and in the first scene they read their father more accurately than anyone else does. Their evil lies in what they do with that accuracy: they use it to take everything from him.


Their love is measured in what it gets them


The sisters' speeches in Act 1 are investments. Each declaration buys a third of the kingdom. Once the purchase is made, the love has no further use, and it disappears almost at once. Within days Goneril is complaining to her steward Oswald about her father's behavior and instructing him to treat Lear coldly:

Put on what weary negligence you please, You and your fellows; I'll have it come to question.

She is deliberately provoking a confrontation she can use to justify cutting his household. The flattery and the cruelty are the same strategy at different stages.


Stripping away the knights mirrors the love test


The scene in Act 2, Scene 4 where the sisters strip away Lear's knights mirrors the love test exactly. In Act 1, they bid up their love for him. Now they bid down what he is allowed to keep:

Goneril: Hear me, my lord; What need you five and twenty, ten, or five, To follow in a house where twice so many Have a command to tend you? Regan: What need one?

The language of quantity that measured love now measures contempt. People who treat love as a transaction will treat its withdrawal the same way.


How Goneril and Regan differ


The two are similar but not identical. Goneril is the initiator: colder, more decisive, quicker to act. Regan tends to follow and then go further, as she does in the love test. In the blinding of Gloucester, Regan is the one who plucks his beard and taunts him, and when a servant tries to stop Cornwall, she seizes a sword and kills him herself.


Their alliance lasts only as long as their interests align. Both fall for Edmund, and the rivalry destroys them. Goneril poisons Regan and then kills herself when her plot is exposed. Two women who claimed to love their father beyond all measure end up unable to keep even their loyalty to each other.


The lesson for judging people


The sisters show how to recognize false love. It is extravagant in words and thin in deeds. It appears when there is something to gain and vanishes when there isn't. It treats affection as a bargaining position. And it often looks, at first, more attractive than the real thing.


Kent and the Fool: the people who tell Lear what he doesn't want to hear


Lear has people around him who try to stop his mistakes. He drives them away or ignores them. Kent and the Fool are the play's portrait of the truth-teller, and of what it costs to have one and refuse to listen.


Kent: "See better, Lear"


Kent is a loyal nobleman who has served Lear all his life. When Lear disowns Cordelia, Kent intervenes, even though contradicting an enraged king is dangerous:

Be Kent unmannerly, When Lear is mad. What wilt thou do, old man? Think'st thou that duty shall have dread to speak, When power to flattery bows? To plainness honour's bound, When majesty stoops to folly.

Kent's argument is that real loyalty requires plain speech precisely when power is bowing to flattery. Lear orders him out of his sight, and Kent answers with the line that could stand as the motto of the whole play:

See better, Lear; and let me still remain The true blank of thine eye.

The "blank" is the white center of an archery target. Kent is asking Lear to keep him in view, to aim his sight by him. Lear banishes him instead.


So in the opening scene, Lear drives away both a loving daughter and a loyal adviser. Both tell him something he does not want to hear. The people who could have helped him judge well are exactly the people he refuses to hear.


Kent is also a good image for the voice in your own head that you would rather not hear. You want to be with this person, you're having a good time, and something in you says look again. Most of us banish that voice the way Lear banishes Kent.


Kent comes back


Banished on pain of death, Kent disguises himself and returns to serve the king who threw him out. When the disguised Kent offers his service, Lear asks what he wants. Kent's answer is "Authority": he sees in Lear's face something he would call master. He stays with Lear through the stripping of the knights, the storm, the madness, and the end. In the final scene, offered a share in ruling the kingdom, Kent declines:

I have a journey, sir, shortly to go; My master calls me, and I must not say no.

He means to follow Lear into death.


The Fool: truth delivered as a joke


The Fool has the license to say what no one else at court may say, and he uses it relentlessly. He tells Lear in a dozen ways that giving away the kingdom was madness:

Thou shouldst not have been old till thou hadst been wise.

He gives Lear a mock lesson in prudence, a string of rhyming rules that amount to keep something back, don't trust too easily:

Have more than thou showest, Speak less than thou knowest, Lend less than thou owest...

And when Lear asks who can tell him who he is, the Fool answers "Lear's shadow." The Fool's jokes sting because they are true.


The Fool also stays. He follows Lear out into the storm, still joking, still telling him uncomfortable things. Then, in the middle of Act 3, he disappears from the play without explanation. Some scholars think the same actor played the Fool and Cordelia in Shakespeare's company, and some modern productions double the roles, a choice that makes Lear's final "my poor fool is hang'd" hit even harder.


Who stays in the storm


Notice who is with Lear on the heath: Kent, back in disguise to serve the king who banished him, and the Fool, still telling him the truth. The people willing to challenge Lear are also the people willing to care for him, even after being rejected. Those two traits tend to travel together. Meanwhile the daughters who praised him most extravagantly have shut the doors against him.


Gloucester, Edgar, and Edmund: the same misjudgment told twice


Shakespeare doubles Lear's story in a subplot. The Earl of Gloucester, like Lear, has a loyal child and a treacherous one, and like Lear he trusts the wrong one. Seeing the error twice makes clear that it is not a quirk of one old king. It is a pattern of human failure.


Edmund: the deceiver who knows exactly what he's doing


Edmund is Gloucester's illegitimate son, and he resents the law and custom that make him lesser than his legitimate brother. His first soliloquy announces his creed:

Thou, Nature, art my goddess; to thy law My services are bound. Wherefore should I Stand in the plague of custom, and permit The curiosity of nations to deprive me? ... Now, gods, stand up for bastards!

Edmund is witty, charming, and candid with the audience, which makes him one of the most magnetic villains in Shakespeare. That charm is part of the lesson. The person working to deceive you is often more appealing than the people who aren't.

Edmund also explains precisely why his scheme will work:

A credulous father! and a brother noble, Whose nature is so far from doing harms, That he suspects none: on whose foolish honesty My practises ride easy!

He exploits two kinds of misjudgment. His father believes too easily. His brother, being honest, can't imagine dishonesty in others. Edmund forges a letter in Edgar's hand, lets Gloucester "discover" it, and then plays the reluctant, loyal son. Gloucester never asks Edgar directly. He accepts a single piece of convenient evidence over a lifetime of knowing his son's character, which is Lear's mistake exactly.


Later Edmund betrays his father to Cornwall for helping Lear, and he plays Goneril and Regan against each other. Only when he is dying does he show any change. Learning that both sisters died for him, he says, "Yet Edmund was beloved," and then:

Some good I mean to do, Despite of mine own nature.

He tries to revoke the order to kill Lear and Cordelia. It comes too late.


Gloucester: he stumbled when he saw


Gloucester's misjudgment leads to the most horrifying scene in the play. For helping Lear, he is bound to a chair, and Cornwall gouges out his eyes. Blinded, Gloucester calls for Edmund to avenge him, and Regan tells him it was Edmund who betrayed him. In one moment he understands everything.


Shakespeare makes the metaphor explicit. Gloucester had eyes and couldn't see; now, blind, he sees the truth:

I have no way, and therefore want no eyes; I stumbled when I saw.

In despair he speaks one of the bleakest lines in literature:

As flies to wanton boys, are we to the gods; They kill us for their sport.

Edgar: loyalty in disguise


Edgar is the Cordelia of the subplot: the child who is good, misjudged, and cast out. Like Kent, he returns in disguise to care for the father who rejected him. As Poor Tom he leads the blind Gloucester, prevents his suicide, and protects him. He defeats Edmund in single combat. Only at the very end does he reveal himself to his father, and Gloucester's heart, caught between joy and grief, gives out:

his flaw'd heart,— Alack, too weak the conflict to support!— 'Twixt two extremes of passion, joy and grief, Burst smilingly.

Like Lear, Gloucester learns the truth about his children. Like Lear, he learns it too late to live with it. Edgar speaks the play's last lines (in the Folio text; the earlier Quarto gives them to Albany), and they could be a reply to the love test itself:

The weight of this sad time we must obey; Speak what we feel, not what we ought to say.

Say what you mean, not what you're expected to say. Cordelia did exactly that in the first scene, and it cost her everything.


Lear's mistakes in everyday life


None of us will divide a kingdom. But Lear's misjudgment happens to everyone, daily, in smaller forms:

  • At work. You like a coworker without quite knowing why; they just make you feel good. A year later they get the promotion you were after, and you learn they had been taking credit for your ideas all along.

  • In friendship. A friend is wonderful company. You're always laughing together. But when you are sad, suffering, or in trouble, they are nowhere to be found.

  • In family. A brother or sister loudly says they want the best for you, while quietly resenting you and hurting you again and again.

  • In romance. A woman falls for a man who tells other people small lies. She notices but thinks, our relationship is different. Then he cheats on her, and she's baffled that he would deceive her too.

  • In marriage. A man loves a woman who regularly puts him down in front of their friends. He keeps calling it teasing, while wondering why he feels lonely and low whenever he's with her.

  • In business. You choose a partner who is confident and persuasive, everything you wanted. You overlook the small broken promises and the habitual lateness. Then the business hits trouble, and he disappears and leaves you with the bills.

  • In receiving criticism. A friend tells you something uncomfortable about your behavior, so you stop calling them. You spend more time with the friend who assures you that you're right: you're single because you're great and everyone else is the problem.

  • In leadership. A CEO or manager insists, over and over, that they want feedback so problems get caught early. Then an employee writes the proposal explaining what's broken and how to fix it, and that employee is the one who gets fired.


The last two are Lear and Kent exactly. The friend who tells you something uncomfortable is the one to cultivate. That person is the Kent or the Cordelia in your life. The friends who only cheer you on are Goneril and Regan.


Sometimes we simply lack the information to judge well. But often the evidence that someone is working to deceive us is right in front of us, as it was in front of Lear, and we refuse to see it.


Why the play teaches judgment better than advice


In real life, the evidence about someone's character arrives scattered: a small lie this month, a broken promise next month, an absence during a hard week a year later. These observations are spread across days, months, and years, and assembling them into a conclusion is very hard.


Art compresses them. In about three hours, Shakespeare shows us the flattery, the banishment, the stripping away, the storm, the reconciliation, and the death. Choices turn into consequences before our eyes. The scattered observations about character come together into a single image you can carry for the rest of your life.


That is what wisdom is, in part. You live through Lear's mistakes vicariously, so that in your own life you are better able to avoid them. Platitudes like "you are the average of the five people you spend the most time with" are true, and you can agree with them and forget them by dinner. It is much harder to forget Lear driving away Kent, raving in the storm, and carrying Cordelia's body. That image does its work on you when you need it.


Seeing better while there is still time


Return for a moment to Louis C.K.'s joke. Its comic inversion is that he doesn't want to know who his real friends are. In real life, that knowledge is valuable. Had he kept better friends, perhaps they would have steered him away from the behavior that got him into trouble in the first place. That is part of what good friends are for: they see us doing something destructive and care enough to say so. Lear had people like that. He had Cordelia and Kent, and he banished them.


Studying King Lear won't solve every problem in your relationships. It should give you a vivid image of why it matters to know who your real friends are, so that you can cultivate the right relationships. Seeing people for who they are, and what motivates them, is one of the most important human skills. Think how much suffering you could shorten by recognizing sooner that a partner is not a good person. Think how much money and hassle you could save by choosing a business partner who won't vanish when things go wrong. And think how much happiness you could gain by recognizing a good person whose loyalty is quieter or less glamorous than someone else's.


None of this means harshly cutting people out of your life the moment you think you see who they "really are." People make mistakes. The aim is what a good king or queen should have: the ability to see clearly the character of those around you.


The next time someone tells you something you don't want to hear, you might pause before pushing them away. If you have already pushed them away, perhaps you'll think of Lear holding Cordelia, call that person, and ask them to tell you what they were trying to say. The next time someone makes you feel wonderful, enjoy it, but look a little more carefully at what they're trying to accomplish. And perhaps you'll recognize someone who has been loving you all along.


Lear finally sees what he had, but too late. We should read his story while we still have time to see what we have.


For teachers: discussion questions and classroom activities

These questions follow the order of the analysis above. They work for high school and college classes, adult reading groups, and individual study.


Act 1, Scene 1: the love test

  1. Lear asks his daughters which of them "doth love us most" so that he can extend his bounty "where nature doth with merit challenge." What is wrong with the way he has set up this test? What would a better test of his daughters' love have looked like?

  2. Compare Goneril's and Regan's speeches line by line. What do they claim? What concrete actions or commitments, if any, do they offer?

  3. Is Cordelia right to say "Nothing"? Argue both sides. Could she have answered differently without compromising her integrity?

  4. Cordelia says she loves Lear "according to my bond; nor more nor less." What does she mean by "bond"? Why might this be a deeper form of love than her sisters claim?

  5. Regan says Lear "hath ever but slenderly known himself." How does a lack of self-knowledge lead to misjudging others? Find other moments where Lear's self-image is tested.

  6. Why does France take Cordelia without a dowry while Burgundy refuses? What does France's line "Love's not love / When it is mingled with regards that stand / Aloof from the entire point" mean?


Kent and the Fool

  1. Kent says "To plainness honour's bound, / When majesty stoops to folly." Do you agree that loyalty sometimes requires disagreement? Give an example from history or your own experience.

  2. What does Kent mean by "See better, Lear"? Trace images of sight and blindness through the whole play, including Gloucester's line "I stumbled when I saw."

  3. Why does Shakespeare give the Fool, of all characters, the most truthful lines? What does the Fool's license to joke allow him to say?

  4. The Fool disappears in Act 3 without explanation. Why might Shakespeare have removed him? How does his absence change the second half of the play?


Goneril, Regan, and Edmund

  1. The stripping of Lear's knights ("What need you five and twenty, ten, or five?" / "What need one?") echoes the love test. How? What does the parallel suggest about the sisters' view of love?

  2. Edmund is charming and speaks directly to the audience. Why might Shakespeare make his most effective deceiver so likable? What does this suggest about how deception works in real life?

  3. Edmund says his plots "ride easy" on his brother's "foolish honesty." Is Edgar at fault for being deceived? Is Gloucester? What is the difference?

  4. Does Edmund's dying attempt to do "some good... despite of mine own nature" change how you judge him?


Lear, Cordelia, and the ending

  1. Lear says "I did her wrong" as early as Act 1, Scene 5. Why doesn't recognizing his mistake allow him to fix it?

  2. On the heath Lear calls himself "more sinned against than sinning." Is he right? How does his speech about "poor naked wretches" show him changing?

  3. Compare the Lear of Act 1, Scene 1 with the Lear who says "I am a very foolish fond old man" in Act 4, Scene 7. What has he learned?

  4. Why does Cordelia answer "No cause, no cause" when Lear says she has reason to hate him? What does this tell us about the nature of her love?

  5. Many audiences have found the ending unbearable. For more than a century, from 1681 into the 1800s, theaters performed Nahum Tate's rewritten version in which Cordelia lives. Why do you think Shakespeare chose to let her die? What would be lost if she survived?

  6. Edgar's closing lines urge us to "speak what we feel, not what we ought to say." How does this connect to the opening scene?


Connecting the play to life

  1. Think of a time you misjudged someone, either by trusting someone you shouldn't have or by undervaluing someone who was good to you. What evidence did you overlook, and why?

  2. Who are the Kents in your life, the people who tell you things you don't want to hear? How do you usually respond to them?

  3. Why might a play teach judgment more effectively than advice or a list of rules? Do you agree that art can "compress" years of experience?

  4. The Louis C.K. joke inverts the tragic discovery into comedy. Find another example of comedy that takes a tragic situation and turns it upside down. What does the comparison reveal?


Classroom activities

  • Stage the love test. Have three students perform Act 1, Scene 1 from Goneril's speech through Cordelia's "So young, my lord, and true." Run it twice: once with Lear as a sympathetic old man, once as a vain tyrant. Discuss how the staging changes the audience's judgment of Cordelia.

  • Words versus deeds chart. In two columns, list what each daughter says about her love in Act 1 and what she does for Lear later in the play. Do the same for Edmund and Edgar.

  • Rewrite Cordelia's answer. Ask students to write a response Cordelia could have given that keeps her integrity but avoids disaster. Then discuss whether such an answer exists, given how Lear set up the test.

  • The modern Lear. In small groups, write a short scene set in a workplace, friendship, or family that follows the same pattern: flattery rewarded, honesty punished, truth recognized too late.

  • Compare productions. Watch the final scene in two filmed versions, such as Laurence Olivier's 1983 television production and Ian McKellen's 2018 film for the BBC. How does each actor play "Why should a dog, a horse, a rat, have life"?

  • Personal reflection essay. Using a character from the play as a lens, write about a time you or someone you know misjudged a person, and what you would do differently now.

Comments


Donate with PayPal
bottom of page